Why can’t Democrats keep it simple?

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of Calif., arrives for a meeting with House Democrats on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Oct. 26, 2021. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of Calif., arrives for a meeting with House Democrats on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Oct. 26, 2021. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

Congressional Democrats need a KISS—as in keep it simple, stupid. Because the tax plan they’re producing after 8 months of interparty bickering is beginning to look like an overcomplicated, indefensible mess.

When he took office, President Biden proposed some straightforward tax hikes to raise revenue for an ambitious green-energy and social-welfare agenda. He wanted to raise the corporate tax rate from 21% to 28%, raise the top individual income tax rate by 2.6 percentage points, boost capital gains taxes on the wealthy and make other changes that would mostly affect high-income Americans. You could argue the merits of Biden’s plan, but the tax changes were easy to understand and explain.

But now the Biden tax hikes seem to be dead, with the main Democratic idea being a new tax on certain assets held by billionaires. Congress has never imposed a billionaire asset tax. Other countries have, but usually with poor results. The billionaire tax may be unconstitutional and will likely face legal challenges, if enacted. If it stands, it won’t even raise that much money. This hasty pivot from sensible tax hikes to unproven ones gives a sham vibe to the Democrats’ entire legislative agenda.

Democrats are recalculating-recalculating-recalculating because one Senate Democrat, Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona, won’t vote for any tax hike on corporate or personal income. Party liberals accuse her of heresy, as if every Democrat should automatically support higher taxes. But Sinema and a few other moderate Dems, including Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, aren’t the Democrats’ real problem. What ails them most is their 1-vote majority in the Senate, which gives every Democrat in the chamber a de facto veto. If voters sent more Dems to Congress and they held, say, a 5-seat Senate majority, Sinema and Manchin wouldn’t matter, since Dems could pass bills without their votes.

US Senator Kyrsten Sinema, Democrat of Arizona, speaks during the Senate Finance Committee hearing on the nomination of Chris Magnus to be the next US Customs and Border Protection Commissioner, on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, October 19, 2021. (Photo by Rod LAMKEY / POOL / AFP) (Photo by ROD LAMKEY/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)US Senator Kyrsten Sinema, Democrat of Arizona, speaks during the Senate Finance Committee hearing on the nomination of Chris Magnus to be the next US Customs and Border Protection Commissioner, on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, October 19, 2021. (Photo by Rod LAMKEY / POOL / AFP) (Photo by ROD LAMKEY/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)
US Senator Kyrsten Sinema, Democrat of Arizona, speaks during the Senate Finance Committee hearing on the nomination of Chris Magnus to be the next US Customs and Border Protection Commissioner, on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, October 19, 2021. (Photo by Rod LAMKEY / POOL / AFP)

Sinema and Manchin seem to be fine with the billionaire tax—maybe because they know it might not amount to much of a tax hike at all. In theory, Americans with more than $1 billion in assets or $100 million in income for three years in a row would have to pay tax every year on the increased value of their assets. So if the value of Elon Musk’s Tesla stock rose by $1 billion, he’d have to pay capital gains tax on that—amounting to $238 million—even if he didn’t sell the stock.

Americans have no problem with higher taxes on billionaires. Yet even if it worked, the tax would apply to only around 700 people and raise maybe $20 billion a year, or $200 billion over a decade. That’s only one-tenth of the money Biden wants from his other tax changes. The Biden plan, for instance, would raise nearly $200 billion per year from higher income taxes, $180 billion per year from higher business taxes and $52 billion per year from higher estate taxes. Tax cuts for lower- and middle-income Americans would leave the government with about $210 billion more in revenue per year, on net, or $2.1 trillion over a decade, according to the Tax Policy Center.

But the billionaire tax might not work. Steve Rosenthal of the Tax Policy Center highlights several possible problems, including difficulty valuing non-tradeable assets such as real estate, IRS auditing challenges and some billionaires who don’t have millions in ready cash to pay tax bills on assets they haven’t sold. There’s also the likelihood some billionaires would get refunds from the government in years when they suffered losses, or at a minimum the ability to use losses one year to offset gains in another. The outrage headlines practically write themselves.

President Joe Biden delivers remarks at NJ Transit Meadowlands Maintenance Complex to promote hisPresident Joe Biden delivers remarks at NJ Transit Meadowlands Maintenance Complex to promote his
President Joe Biden delivers remarks at NJ Transit Meadowlands Maintenance Complex to promote his “Build Back Better” agenda, Monday, Oct. 25, 2021, in Kearny, N.J. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

A simpler plan would be taxing unsold assets at death, when they pass on to heirs. Current law resets the value of such unsold assets when the holder dies, with no tax due on capital gains, no matter how great. This is an enormous tax break for the wealthy that helps establish and sustain a kind of American aristocracy. Taxing capital gains at death above some exemption level, with exceptions for farms and certain businesses, could generate at least as much revenue as a billionaire tax, and more if the rate were set higher than the current capital gains tax. There would be new complexities administering estates of the wealthy, but the capital-gains tax itself isn’t novel and presents no new administrative challenges.

The billionaire tax may not make it into final legislation, and other elements of the Biden plan that seem like they’re out, for now, could make it back in. Yet Democrats are clearly flailing, given deep divisions within the party and the lack of a “working majority” that can get legislation to the finish line. Biden says he wants Congress to “pay for” most or all of the new programs it would pass in a Biden bill, which means new tax revenue would fully or nearly offset new spending. But phantom revenue may be the best Democrats can come up with, if they can pass any bill at all.

Trending Ideas

Featured Stocks On The Move

Daily Rundown

Top 3 Stocks in Leading Sectors
  • 3 Electric Power Stocks To Buy Now

    Featured Content Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc. (HE) Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc. is a holding company that provides electric utility services and financial services in Hawaii. Through its subsidiaries, it supplies... Read More

  • 3 Bank Stocks To Buy Now

    Featured Content Comerica Incorporated (CMA) Comerica Incorporated is a financial services company headquartered in Dallas, Texas, offering a range of banking products and services, including commercial and retail banking, wealth... Read More

  • 3 Machinery Stocks To Buy Now

    Featured Content Alta Equipment Group Inc. (ALTG) Alta Equipment Group Inc. is an integrated equipment dealership platform in the United States, operating through three segments: Material Handling, Construction Equipment, and... Read More

  • 3 Silver Stocks To Buy Now

    Featured Content Gatos Silver, Inc. (GATO) Gatos Silver, Inc. is a precious metals mining company primarily focused on silver and zinc production. Its flagship Cerro Los Gatos mine in Mexico... Read More

  • 3 Metal Production Stocks To Buy Now

    Featured Content Century Aluminum Company (CENX) Century Aluminum Company is a primary aluminum producer, with operations that include the production of high-purity, low-carbon aluminum used in automotive, aerospace, and industrial... Read More

  • 3 Medical Drug Stocks To Buy Now

    Featured Content Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited (TEVA) Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited is a global pharmaceutical company specializing in generic and specialty medicines. The company provides a wide range of treatments... Read More

  • 3 Paper Product Stocks To Buy Now

    Featured Content AptarGroup Inc. (ATR) AptarGroup Inc. is a global leader in providing innovative dispensing and packaging solutions, serving diverse industries like beauty, personal care, and pharmaceuticals. They focus on... Read More

  • 3 Restaurant Stocks To Buy Now

    Featured Content Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) Brinker International, Inc. operates well-known restaurant brands such as Chili’s Grill & Bar and Maggiano’s Little Italy. The company is a leader in the... Read More

  • 3 Investment Brokerage Stocks To Buy Now

    Featured Content Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) Robinhood Markets, Inc. is a financial services company known for its commission-free trading platform, which allows users to trade stocks, options, cryptocurrencies, and ETFs.... Read More

  • 3 Shipping Stocks To Buy Now

    Featured Content ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. is a global container shipping company that provides cargo transportation services worldwide. The company operates a modern... Read More

  • 3 Mining Stocks To Buy Now

    Featured Content Perpetua Resources Corp. (PPTA) Perpetua Resources Corp. is a mining company focused on the exploration and redevelopment of the Stibnite Gold Project in Idaho, which is one of... Read More

  • 3 Airline Stocks To Buy Now

    Featured Content General Electric Company (GE) General Electric Company is a global industrial conglomerate with operations spanning sectors such as aviation, healthcare, power, and renewable energy. GE is known for... Read More